
Extradition Between UAE and Israel
An arrest abroad on an Interpol warrant is not a procedural formality. It carries a real risk of months in detention, forced deportation, and transfer to the requesting state. Delay in securing legal defence is simply not an option.
From a legal standpoint, the situation has one defining feature: no direct bilateral extradition treaty exists between Israel and the UAE. The criminal-law relationship between the two states is governed by the principle of reciprocity — established after the Abraham Accords were signed in 2020 — and by the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime.
The absence of a direct treaty is not a minor technicality. It creates a powerful procedural barrier that a qualified UAE Israel extradition attorney can exploit to block a request at the earliest stage. Speed is everything.If you or a family member have been detained on an international warrant — contact our team immediately. The first hours decide the outcome.
Legal Framework and Extradition Agreements
Transferring a suspect across borders requires a firm legal foundation. The UAE–Israel extradition legal agreement framework rests on international conventions and domestic legislation of each country.
The UAE’s primary instrument is Federal Law No. 39 of 2006 on International Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters. Israel operates under the Extradition Law of 1954 (Extradition Law, 5714-1954). Both statutes govern request procedures, detention timelines, and grounds for refusal.
The central requirement in both jurisdictions is the principle of double criminality: the act underlying the extradition request must constitute a criminal offence under the laws of both countries simultaneously. If that threshold is not met, extradition is legally impermissible.
An additional legal pillar is the UN Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, to which both the UAE and Israel are parties. It is the instrument both sides invoke in the absence of a bilateral agreement.
Passive Extradition: Detention Procedure in the UAE
The UAE strictly regulates the detention of foreign nationals on international requests. Local courts conduct thorough scrutiny of the requesting state’s grounds before any transfer can proceed.
Detention Stages and the Role of Relevant Ministries
Detention typically occurs at an airport — most often at Dubai International (DXB) or Abu Dhabi — on the basis of an Interpol arrest warrant in UAE. This is the moment the critical clock starts.
After arrest, the detainee is transferred to police custody and the case is referred to the prosecutor’s office. The prosecution assesses whether the request meets the requirements of domestic law and international conventions.
The decision on the admissibility of extradition rests with the Court of Appeal — Dubai Court of Appeal or Abu Dhabi Judicial Department. That ruling can be challenged before the Court of Cassation. The Ministry of Justice of the UAE has the final word on approval or refusal.The standard period of provisional detention under an Interpol Red Notice in Dubai pending receipt of the formal extradition package is 30–60 days. Defence counsel must build a complete legal defence within that window.
Active Extradition: Requests Initiated by Israel
Initiating the return of a suspect to Israeli territory is a complex bureaucratic process. It demands a flawless evidentiary package and full translation of all documents into Arabic.
The procedure begins with coordination between Israeli police and Interpol. A competent Israeli court — typically the Jerusalem District Court — must then authorise an international arrest warrant. Without that judicial sanction, no formal request can be filed.
The completed documentation is transmitted through official diplomatic channels. The UAE examines it for compliance with its own procedural law. Any formal deficiency — however minor — is sufficient grounds for refusal.Retaining a specialist in UAE Israel extradition legal services at the document-review stage allows counsel to identify such deficiencies before the matter reaches a court hearing. Hire a UAE lawyer with Israel extradition experience as early as possible.
Grounds for Refusal and Rights Protection
The legislation of both jurisdictions contains strict filters designed to protect fundamental rights. Extradition is neither automatic nor guaranteed under the UAE Israel extradition process.
A UAE court may refuse extradition on the following grounds:
- Absence of double criminality: the conduct does not constitute a criminal offence under UAE law.
- Expiry of the statute of limitations under the laws of the requested state.
- Political, racial, or religious motivation behind the prosecution.
- Risk of the death penalty or torture in the requesting state.
Interpol Red Notice: What You Need to Know
A Red Notice is a request to provisionally arrest a person pending extradition. It is not a verdict or proof of guilt. Its legal status is that of a notification — not a binding warrant.
To find out whether you are subject to a Red Notice, you must contact the Interpol General Secretariat via the official interpol.int website (the ‘Notices’ section) or submit a legal inquiry through counsel. Self-checks against public databases are unreliable — a significant share of notices is classified.A further practical step is prevention of an Interpol Red Notice: counsel files a review request with Interpol’s Commission for the Control of Files (CCF) and, where warranted, seeks deletion or suspension of the notice.
| Parameter | Red Notice | Blue Notice |
| Purpose | Locate and provisionally arrest for extradition | Collect information on a person linked to a crime |
| Basis | Arrest warrant issued by a court in the requesting state | Request from a law enforcement authority |
| Legal consequences | Detention up to 30–60 days; extradition process initiated | No detention envisaged; information request only |
| Israel’s role | Israel is an Interpol member; Red Notices issued via NCB | Used in investigations not requiring immediate arrest |
Israel’s approach to extraditing its own nationals warrants particular attention. Under Section 1A of the Extradition Law 1954, Israel as a rule refuses to extradite its citizens to foreign states. An exception is possible only where guaranteed repatriation of the convicted person to serve their sentence in Israel is secured.Israel has been a member of Interpol since 1949. The Israeli National Central Bureau (NCB) is housed within the Israel National Police and is authorised to both submit and receive international requests. Interpol warrants most wanted notices originating from Israel therefore carry full legal weight within the Interpol system.
Why a Specialist Attorney Is Non-Negotiable
Procedural errors at the earliest stage of detention can prove fatal to the entire case. Only a licensed specialist can construct a reliable barrier against deportation.
Counsel must be engaged within the first hours of detention. That is the window in which the most consequential procedural acts occur: questioning, record preparation, and assessment of grounds for continued detention.
A criminal lawyer in Dubai with international expertise handles several tasks simultaneously: applying for bail, blocking questioning without defence present, and identifying procedural violations in the foreign state’s request.
Equally critical is scrutiny of the request itself. An Interpol lawyer in Dubai examines the documentation for formal grounds of refusal — absence of double criminality, expired limitation period, political motive. Any one of these, properly documented, can halt the extradition process.
The UAE legal system provides real tools for protection in how extradition works between UAE and Israel. The key is using them promptly and with professional backing.
Need a consultation on extradition or an Interpol matter? Contact our specialists — we handle cases across UAE and Israel.

FAQ
Does an extradition treaty exist between the UAE and Israel?
No. There is no bilateral extradition treaty. The 2020 Abraham Accords do not regulate this issue. Israel is not a party to the 1983 Riyadh Convention. There is no legal basis for extradition.
Has cooperation changed after the Abraham Accords?
In terms of extradition — no. The accords created diplomatic channels, opened embassies, and established trade. No extradition treaty or mutual legal assistance agreement in criminal matters has been signed. Informal cooperation between intelligence services is possible but not legally formalized.
Can an Israeli citizen be extradited from the UAE?
Yes, but only under Federal Law No. 39/2006 on the basis of reciprocity. The UAE reviews such cases individually and at its own discretion. The UAE has no obligation to extradite. UAE citizens are never extradited to any country — this is an absolute prohibition.
How does the UAE review requests when no treaty exists?
Under Federal Law No. 39/2006: request via the Ministry of Foreign Affairs → Ministry of Justice → court → government decision. Mandatory conditions: dual criminality, punishment of at least 1 year, proper documentation. The government may reject the request even after court approval — political discretion is absolute.
Which crimes can realistically serve as grounds for extradition?
Only serious transnational offences: money laundering, large‑scale fraud, drug trafficking, cybercrime, terrorism. Acts that have no equivalent under UAE law are not grounds for extradition. Political and military offences are excluded.
Is extradition from Israel to the UAE possible?
In practice — no. Israel does not extradite its citizens. There is no treaty. There are no precedents. A number of acts criminalized in the UAE under Sharia‑based provisions are not crimes in Israel — the principle of dual criminality is not automatically met.
How to defend against extradition?
Three effective tools:
(1) absence of a treaty — a procedural argument on its own;
(2) challenging dual criminality — if the act is not a crime in the requested state, extradition is impossible;
(3) defects in the request documentation — the UAE imposes strict formal requirements, and failure to meet them results in refusal. A lawyer must be engaged before detention — after arrest, defence options narrow sharply.

